SMT. SUSHILA DWIVEDI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2895/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010226782026
Filing Number
WPC/12954/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2895/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES: 2601 TO 2604 ( 26 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS. ( 2604 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SUSHILA DWIVEDI
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KESHARWANI,Juhi Anguriya,Juhi Anguriya, ,SHRIJITA KESHARWANI,Juhi Anguriya
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Commissioner
-
3.The Collector
-
4.The Sub Divisional Officer (r)
-
5.The Additional Tehsildar
-
6.Jailal Dhiwar
-
7.Mayaram Dhiwar
-
8.Vishnu dhiwar
-
9.Bahrin Bai
-
10.Meera Bai
-
11.Jitendra Dhiwar
-
12.Jageshwar Dhiwar
-
13.Dhannu Dhiwar
-
14.Beduram Dhiwar
-
15.Abhilesh Dhiwar
-
16.Pawan Dhiwar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/2895/2026 Smt. Sushila Dwivedi challenged the Commissioner's order (04.06.2026) dismissing her appeal against the Collector's order (16.12.2024). However, during proceedings, petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal with liberty to pursue revision before the Board of Revenue, which was unopposed. The court allowed withdrawal, permitting the petitioner to file revision with interim relief applications before the Board, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on merits, leaving all questions open for the revisional authority's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2895/2026
Case Summary: WPC/2895/2026 Smt. Sushila Dwivedi challenged the Commissioner's order (04.06.2026) dismissing her appeal against the Collector's order (16.12.2024). However, during proceedings, petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal with liberty to pursue revision before the Board of Revenue, which was unopposed. The court allowed withdrawal, permitting the petitioner to file revision with interim relief applications before the Board, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on merits, leaving all questions open for the revisional authority's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts