SMT. MANBHULA BAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G. — WP227/664/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010226282026

Filing Number

WP227/12929/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP227/664/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MANBHULA BAI

    Adv. AKASH AGRAWAL,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI, ,SAHIL SAHU,ANSHIT SINGH HORA,Amrita Sharma,Amrita Sharma,Ravindra Sharma,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI

  2. 2.Sandhya,

  3. 3.Sanjay,

  4. 4.Anita,

  5. 5.Dashoda,

  6. 6.Sanju,

  7. 7.Gunja,

  8. 8.Dhanamuni @ Bharti Mandi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Revenue Inspector,

  3. 3.Halka Patwari,

  4. 4.Station House Incharge,

  5. 5.Bhola Das,

  6. 6.Dr. Sudhir Gangey,

  7. 7.P.V. Umman,

  8. 8.Sachin Kumar Yadav,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP227 No. 664 of 2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Smt. Manbhula Bai's petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 18/06/2026. The court issued notice to respondents No.5 to 8 upon payment of prescribed fees and adjourned the case for listing immediately after receipt of the service report. No final order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/664/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP227 No. 664 of 2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Smt. Manbhula Bai's petition against the State of Chhattisgarh on 18/06/2026. The court issued notice to respondents No.5 to 8 upon payment of prescribed fees and adjourned the case for listing immediately after receipt of the service report. No final order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case