KIRTAN MANJHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5299/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010226142026

Filing Number

MCRC/9690/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5299/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRTAN MANJHI

    Adv. SHIVANSHU PANDEY,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK, ,POOJA YADAV,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: MCRC/5299/2026 - Kirtan Manjhi v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Kirtan Manjhi, arrested for allegedly possessing 10 litres of illicit liquor under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act. The court found the case suitable for bail considering the lack of exclusive seizure evidence, prolonged pre-trial detention since March 16, 2026, and expected trial duration, despite the applicant's one prior criminal conviction. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MCRC/5299/2026 - Kirtan Manjhi v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Kirtan Manjhi, arrested for allegedly possessing 10 litres of illicit liquor under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act. The court found the case suitable for bail considering the lack of exclusive seizure evidence, prolonged pre-trial detention since March 16, 2026, and expected trial duration, despite the applicant's one prior criminal conviction. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case