DHAN KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/878/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010225802026

Filing Number

MCRCA/9673/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/878/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHAN KUMAR

    Adv. Amit Kumar Sahu,RAJKUMAR PALI,RAJKUMAR PALI, ,Amit Kumar Sahu,PRATIBHA SAHU,RAJKUMAR PALI

  2. 2.Manish

  3. 3.Chandraprakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 878/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Dhan Kumar, Manish, and Chandraprakash in a case involving alleged assault on May 15, 2026. The court found that injuries sustained were simple in nature and that the applicants had no specific roles attributed to them, particularly noting the elderly first applicant's uninvolvement. Bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing personal bonds with local sureties, regular court attendance, non-tampering with witnesses, and submission of Aadhaar identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/878/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 878/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Dhan Kumar, Manish, and Chandraprakash in a case involving alleged assault on May 15, 2026. The court found that injuries sustained were simple in nature and that the applicants had no specific roles attributed to them, particularly noting the elderly first applicant's uninvolvement. Bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing personal bonds with local sureties, regular court attendance, non-tampering with witnesses, and submission of Aadhaar identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case