GULSHAN KASHYAP EKTA SAHU, ,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,MINAKSHI GUPTA,MINAKSHI GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5282/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010225712026

Filing Number

MCRC/9668/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5282/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN KASHYAP EKTA SAHU, ,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,MINAKSHI GUPTA,MINAKSHI GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5282/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Gulshan Kashyap, accused of cyber extortion and abetment to suicide under Sections 108 BNS and 66(D) IT Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in an extortion scheme where a 24-year-old woman was threatened with fake claims of possessing objectionable videos, extorted Rs. 60,000, and subsequently committed suicide; Rs. 26,999 of extorted money traced to his bank account, mobile numbers recovered from his possession, and investigation revealed his participation in a coordinated cyber fraud racket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5282/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Gulshan Kashyap, accused of cyber extortion and abetment to suicide under Sections 108 BNS and 66(D) IT Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in an extortion scheme where a 24-year-old woman was threatened with fake claims of possessing objectionable videos, extorted Rs. 60,000, and subsequently committed suicide; Rs. 26,999 of extorted money traced to his bank account, mobile numbers recovered from his possession, and investigation revealed his participation in a coordinated cyber fraud racket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case