MRS. VIDHI SONI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/882/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010225362026

Filing Number

MCRCA/9658/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/882/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS. VIDHI SONI

    Adv. VIKAS UPADHYAY,SATISH CHANDRA,SATISH CHANDRA, ,Pritam Singh,Sachin Nidhi,Sachin Nidhi,Sachin Nidhi,Sachin Nidhi,JAGDISH PRASAD LATHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 882/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mrs. Vidhi Soni in a vehicle non-return case (FIR 184/2026). The court found the dispute predominantly civil in nature—arising from a rental agreement where the applicant allegedly failed to return a hired car and motorcycle—and held that criminal charges under BNS Sections 318(4) and 316(3) lacked prima facie merit. The court noted the vehicles had been recovered and released, eliminating custody necessity, and imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation and court appearance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 882/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mrs. Vidhi Soni in a vehicle non-return case (FIR 184/2026). The court found the dispute predominantly civil in nature—arising from a rental agreement where the applicant allegedly failed to return a hired car and motorcycle—and held that criminal charges under BNS Sections 318(4) and 316(3) lacked prima facie merit. The court noted the vehicles had been recovered and released, eliminating custody necessity, and imposed standard bail conditions including cooperation with investigation and court appearance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case