ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KIBAIBALENGA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2886/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010225092026
Filing Number
WPC/12863/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2886/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT ( 1754 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KIBAIBALENGA
Adv. shobhit koshta,RAJENDRA KUMAR,RAJENDRA KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Registrar
-
3.Managing Director
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
4.District Marketing Officer Kondagaon
-
5.Collector (Food Branch)
-
6.Assistant Commissioner / Assistant Registrar
-
7.Nodal Officer
-
8.Managing Director
Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/2886/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of five clubbed petitions filed by tribal cooperative societies challenging notices directing them to deliver paddy shortages under the 2025-26 procurement policy (which disallows dry quantity). The court ordered respondent authorities to decide the petitioners' replies on merits within 45 days while prohibiting coercive action pending decision, declining to adjudicate the substantive dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2886/2026
Case Summary: WPC/2886/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of five clubbed petitions filed by tribal cooperative societies challenging notices directing them to deliver paddy shortages under the 2025-26 procurement policy (which disallows dry quantity). The court ordered respondent authorities to decide the petitioners' replies on merits within 45 days while prohibiting coercive action pending decision, declining to adjudicate the substantive dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts