EURO PRATIK ISPAT ( INDIA) PVT. LTD. OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Trivikram Nayak vs MAJESTIC LEGENDS SPORTS PVT. LTD. — CRMP/1522/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010224862026
Filing Number
CRMP/9631/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1522/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EURO PRATIK ISPAT ( INDIA) PVT. LTD. OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Trivikram Nayak
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAJESTIC LEGENDS SPORTS PVT. LTD.
-
2.Mr. Janak Shrirang Tekale,
-
3.Mr. Bhushan Manohar Malandkar,
-
4.Mrs Manisha Shantilal Jain
-
5.Mrs. Nisha Tapadia,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: CRMP 1522/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further three-month extension of time to the Judicial Magistrate First Class, District Raipur, to decide Complaint Case No. 5685/2023 between Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Majestic Legends Sports Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The petition was disposed of based on the reasons cited in the Postponement Utilization Demand (PUD) submitted by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1522/2026
Case Summary: CRMP 1522/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further three-month extension of time to the Judicial Magistrate First Class, District Raipur, to decide Complaint Case No. 5685/2023 between Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Majestic Legends Sports Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The petition was disposed of based on the reasons cited in the Postponement Utilization Demand (PUD) submitted by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts