KAMLES PRADHAN @ KAMLESH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5311/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224762026

Filing Number

MCRC/9627/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5311/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLES PRADHAN @ KAMLESH

    Adv. GURUDEV I.SHARAN,BHUPENDRA KUMAR BHOI,BHUPENDRA KUMAR BHOI, ,ADARSH RAJPUT

  2. 2.Tekchand Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5311/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to applicants Kamles Pradhan and Tekchand Sahu, arrested for illegal possession of 40 litres of country-made Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court found them entitled to bail considering their clean criminal records, the filed charge-sheet, prolonged incarceration since April 9, 2026, and anticipated lengthy trial duration. The release was conditional on furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each and adhering to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5311/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to applicants Kamles Pradhan and Tekchand Sahu, arrested for illegal possession of 40 litres of country-made Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court found them entitled to bail considering their clean criminal records, the filed charge-sheet, prolonged incarceration since April 9, 2026, and anticipated lengthy trial duration. The release was conditional on furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each and adhering to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case