DEVESH TIWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/879/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010224712026
Filing Number
MCRCA/9625/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/879/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVESH TIWARI
Adv. GURUDEV I.SHARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA/879/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Devesh Tiwari's bail application under Section 483 BNS for a Section 69 offense. Tiwari was charged with breaching promises of marriage to a woman with whom he maintained a 6-7 year relationship, resulting in her pregnancy in October 2025, and subsequently marrying another woman on April 21, 2026, despite repeated assurances of marriage and family inducements. The court found the prosecutrix's allegations credible and serious, citing her vulnerability and the manner of alleged commission, determining no case for bail existed at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/879/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA/879/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Devesh Tiwari's bail application under Section 483 BNS for a Section 69 offense. Tiwari was charged with breaching promises of marriage to a woman with whom he maintained a 6-7 year relationship, resulting in her pregnancy in October 2025, and subsequently marrying another woman on April 21, 2026, despite repeated assurances of marriage and family inducements. The court found the prosecutrix's allegations credible and serious, citing her vulnerability and the manner of alleged commission, determining no case for bail existed at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts