SHRI ASHOK KUMAR PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4528/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010224632026

Filing Number

WPS/12842/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPS/4528/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI ASHOK KUMAR PATEL

    Adv. Shalvik Tiwari,Ashwin Panickar,Ashwin Panickar, ,PRATIK MODI,Ashwin Panickar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Directorate of Public Instructions

  3. 3.Shri Mahendra Nath Pandey

  4. 4.Shri Mahendra Nath Pandey

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: In WPS 4528/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Shri Ashok Kumar Patel's challenge against the State. The State informed the court that the petitioner was placed under suspension and attached to the Headquarters of the Directorate of Public Instructions, Naya Raipur, via an order dated 18.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought time, stating he lacked instructions regarding the suspension order. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing in the next week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4528/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPS 4528/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Shri Ashok Kumar Patel's challenge against the State. The State informed the court that the petitioner was placed under suspension and attached to the Headquarters of the Directorate of Public Instructions, Naya Raipur, via an order dated 18.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought time, stating he lacked instructions regarding the suspension order. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing in the next week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case