LALE BASOD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5336/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224352026

Filing Number

MCRC/9603/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5336/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALE BASOD

    Adv. Ritesh Verma,SOMNATH VERMA,SOMNATH VERMA, ,SOMNATH VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Lale Basod in his second bail application for alleged jewelry shop theft (Crime No. 272/2024), where approximately Rs. 9 lakhs worth of jewelry was stolen. The court found that with 11 of 24 prosecution witnesses' statements recorded, the trial likely to take considerable time, and the applicant having been in custody since September 2025, he was entitled to bail. Release was granted on personal bond with two sureties (one local, one family member), subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests when witnesses present, and personal appearance at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Lale Basod in his second bail application for alleged jewelry shop theft (Crime No. 272/2024), where approximately Rs. 9 lakhs worth of jewelry was stolen. The court found that with 11 of 24 prosecution witnesses' statements recorded, the trial likely to take considerable time, and the applicant having been in custody since September 2025, he was entitled to bail. Release was granted on personal bond with two sureties (one local, one family member), subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests when witnesses present, and personal appearance at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case