ANAS RAJPUT PRIYA AGRAWAL, ,SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5239/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224332026

Filing Number

MCRC/9602/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5239/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAS RAJPUT PRIYA AGRAWAL, ,SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5239/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the regular bail application of 18-year-old Anas Rajput, arrested for alleged ganja trafficking under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found that 14.920 kg of ganja recovered from the applicant's possession, when considered with 20.210 kg seized from a co-accused, exceeded commercial quantity limits, and the applicant failed to provide satisfactory explanation for such possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5239/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the regular bail application of 18-year-old Anas Rajput, arrested for alleged ganja trafficking under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found that 14.920 kg of ganja recovered from the applicant's possession, when considered with 20.210 kg seized from a co-accused, exceeded commercial quantity limits, and the applicant failed to provide satisfactory explanation for such possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case