SONARAM FARSA OFFICE REFERENCE, ,YUVRAJ SINGH,YUVRAJ SINGH,NIHAL KASHYAP,Ravi Kumar Tandan vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1524/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224312026

Filing Number

CRMP/9600/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1524/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONARAM FARSA OFFICE REFERENCE, ,YUVRAJ SINGH,YUVRAJ SINGH,NIHAL KASHYAP,Ravi Kumar Tandan

  2. 2.Vijay Jurri

  3. 3.Ramlal Karma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: CRMP No. 1524 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further four-month extension for trial completion in Special Case (NIA) No. 29/2024 involving serious UAPA offences. The court found the extension request reasonable given voluminous evidence, extensive witness examination (33 prosecution witnesses examined), non-service of summons, health issues, and the court's simultaneous handling of multiple NIA cases, while directing the trial court to conclude proceedings at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRMP No. 1524 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a further four-month extension for trial completion in Special Case (NIA) No. 29/2024 involving serious UAPA offences. The court found the extension request reasonable given voluminous evidence, extensive witness examination (33 prosecution witnesses examined), non-service of summons, health issues, and the court's simultaneous handling of multiple NIA cases, while directing the trial court to conclude proceedings at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case