BHUPENDRA SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5211/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224242026

Filing Number

MCRC/9593/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5211/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRA SAHU

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GULATI,GUNJA TARAM,GUNJA TARAM, ,GUNJA TARAM,GUNJA TARAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 5211/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Bhupendra Sahu, arrested for possessing 2.82 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B). The court found that while the applicant had three prior IPC convictions, he had no previous NDPS offenses and the seized quantity was below the intermediate threshold, making bail appropriate despite the state's opposition. Release was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions requiring court attendance and no adjournment seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 5211/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Bhupendra Sahu, arrested for possessing 2.82 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B). The court found that while the applicant had three prior IPC convictions, he had no previous NDPS offenses and the seized quantity was below the intermediate threshold, making bail appropriate despite the state's opposition. Release was granted on personal bond with two sureties and conditions requiring court attendance and no adjournment seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case