RAJKUMAR NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/869/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224192026

Filing Number

MCRCA/9590/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/869/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR NISHAD

    Adv. SATYENDRA SRIVAS,RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR,RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR, ,RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA No. 869/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajkumar Nishad, a Post Office employee accused of criminal breach of trust under IPC Section 406. The applicant was alleged to have misappropriated Rs. 1,75,000 out of Rs. 2,38,000 in monthly installments collected from a complainant for deposit into a recurring deposit account. The court allowed bail primarily due to the considerable delay in filing the FIR (from November 2022 to May 2026), the applicant's clean criminal record, and the prolonged nature of alleged cash transactions, subject to standard bail conditions including personal bond and surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/869/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA No. 869/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajkumar Nishad, a Post Office employee accused of criminal breach of trust under IPC Section 406. The applicant was alleged to have misappropriated Rs. 1,75,000 out of Rs. 2,38,000 in monthly installments collected from a complainant for deposit into a recurring deposit account. The court allowed bail primarily due to the considerable delay in filing the FIR (from November 2022 to May 2026), the applicant's clean criminal record, and the prolonged nature of alleged cash transactions, subject to standard bail conditions including personal bond and surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case