SANTOSH DHANWANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5298/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010224002026

Filing Number

MCRC/9577/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5298/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH DHANWANI

    Adv. SHALVIN SHARMA,DEVERSHI THAKUR,DEVERSHI THAKUR, ,PALAASH JHA,PALAASH JHA,PALAASH JHA,SWATI RANI SARAF,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,ANAMIKA JAIN,ANAMIKA JAIN,DEVERSHI THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5298/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Santosh Dhanwani's bail application in a large-scale narcotics trafficking case involving 28 accused persons and 412 grams of heroin seizure. Although no contraband was directly recovered from Dhanwani's possession, the court found prima facie evidence of his connection to co-accused persons through financial transactions with the main accused, and considered the serious nature of NDPS Act violations alongside prior rejection of similar bail applications by co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5298/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Santosh Dhanwani's bail application in a large-scale narcotics trafficking case involving 28 accused persons and 412 grams of heroin seizure. Although no contraband was directly recovered from Dhanwani's possession, the court found prima facie evidence of his connection to co-accused persons through financial transactions with the main accused, and considered the serious nature of NDPS Act violations alongside prior rejection of similar bail applications by co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case