JITENDRA PANNA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4543/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010223662026
Filing Number
WPS/12802/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPS/4543/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. ( 606 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA PANNA
Adv. Siddharth Pandey,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
4.The Tahsildar, Tamnar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/4543/2026 (Jitendra Panna v. State of Chhattisgarh) The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the Inquiry Officer to conclude a pending departmental enquiry against suspended Patwari Jitendra Panna within six months. A charge sheet was issued on 03/12/2024, but proceedings had stalled due to parallel E.O.W investigations into the petitioner's land acquisition involvement. The court granted limited relief without expressing any opinion on the merits, directing the Inquiry Officer to proceed according to law and complete the enquiry expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4543/2026
Case Summary: WPS/4543/2026 (Jitendra Panna v. State of Chhattisgarh) The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the Inquiry Officer to conclude a pending departmental enquiry against suspended Patwari Jitendra Panna within six months. A charge sheet was issued on 03/12/2024, but proceedings had stalled due to parallel E.O.W investigations into the petitioner's land acquisition involvement. The court granted limited relief without expressing any opinion on the merits, directing the Inquiry Officer to proceed according to law and complete the enquiry expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts