M/S R.K. TRADING COMPANY vs U c o BANK Advocate - P R PATANKAR, ,SWAPNIL THAWANEY,PRAVESH SAHU,PRAVESH SAHU,PRAJAKTA PATANKAR — WPC/2887/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010222392026
Filing Number
WPC/12742/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2887/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S R.K. TRADING COMPANY
Adv. CHAKRESH TIWARI,B.P.SHARMA,B.P.SHARMA, ,PUSHP KUMAR GUPTA,RAZA ALI,SAMEER ORAON,M.L.SAKAT,B.P.SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.U c o BANK Advocate - P R PATANKAR, ,SWAPNIL THAWANEY,PRAVESH SAHU,PRAVESH SAHU,PRAJAKTA PATANKAR
-
2.S M E Hub,
-
3.U C O bank
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2887/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court directed UCO Bank to consider and decide R.K. Trading Company's Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) 5.0 application within 10 days from receipt of the court order, strictly in accordance with applicable laws and scheme guidelines. The court expressly clarified it made no determination on the petitioner's merits or eligibility, leaving that assessment entirely to the bank's competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2887/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2887/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court directed UCO Bank to consider and decide R.K. Trading Company's Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) 5.0 application within 10 days from receipt of the court order, strictly in accordance with applicable laws and scheme guidelines. The court expressly clarified it made no determination on the petitioner's merits or eligibility, leaving that assessment entirely to the bank's competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts