BIRICHBAI YADAV vs RAJESH SUKUMAR TOPPO Advocate - VIVEK SIDDHARTH OJHA, ,RAKESH KUMAR JHA,RAKESH KUMAR JHA,RAKESH KUMAR JHA — CONT/743/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010222042026

Filing Number

CONT/12724/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CONT/743/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIRICHBAI YADAV

    Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL,ITU BHATTACHARYA,ITU BHATTACHARYA, ,RAJENDRA PATEL

  2. 2.Rudranarayan Patel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH SUKUMAR TOPPO Advocate - VIVEK SIDDHARTH OJHA, ,RAKESH KUMAR JHA,RAKESH KUMAR JHA,RAKESH KUMAR JHA

  2. 2.Shankar Thakur,

  3. 3.Amrit Vikas Topno,

  4. 4.Vinay Kumar Kashyap

  5. 5.Jitendra Kumar Netam,

  6. 6.S.K. Sukhdev ,

  7. 7.Vinod Kumar Suryavanshi

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: CONT 743/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents requiring them to show cause within ten days why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them, subject to payment of process fee. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CONT 743/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents requiring them to show cause within ten days why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them, subject to payment of process fee. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case