PURUSHOTTAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5285/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010221882026

Filing Number

MCRC/9471/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5285/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURUSHOTTAM SAHU

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5285/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Purushottam Sahu, arrested for allegedly carrying an unlicensed knife in violation of Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Although acknowledging the crime and applicant's three prior criminal convictions (2016, 2020, 2022), the court found bail justified given that the chargesheet was filed, he had been in custody since March 31, 2026, and trial would take considerable time. Release was conditioned on a personal bond with two sureties and compliance with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during witness testimony, and potential bail cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5285/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Purushottam Sahu, arrested for allegedly carrying an unlicensed knife in violation of Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Although acknowledging the crime and applicant's three prior criminal convictions (2016, 2020, 2022), the court found bail justified given that the chargesheet was filed, he had been in custody since March 31, 2026, and trial would take considerable time. Release was conditioned on a personal bond with two sureties and compliance with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during witness testimony, and potential bail cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case