TOSHRAM CHOUDHARY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2816/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 09th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010221412026
Filing Number
WPC/12692/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2816/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TOSHRAM CHOUDHARY
Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.Babulal Patel
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector Mahasamund
-
3.District Co- Operative
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
4.Deputy Commissioner
-
5.Branch Manager
Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel
-
6.Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2816/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Toshram Choudhary and Babulal Patel against the State of Chhattisgarh and other respondents on June 9, 2026. The petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies, which the court granted with the respondents' consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2816/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2816/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Toshram Choudhary and Babulal Patel against the State of Chhattisgarh and other respondents on June 9, 2026. The petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies, which the court granted with the respondents' consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts