MAHESH KUMAR SONKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2813/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 09th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010221372026
Filing Number
WPC/12688/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2813/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH KUMAR SONKAR
Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.Hujur Prasad Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector Mahasamund
-
3.District Co-Operative Markfed Officer Mahasamund
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
4.Deputy Commissioner/Deputy Registrar
-
5.Branch Manager
Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel
-
6.Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Achhola
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC No. 2813/2026 on 09/06/2026 after the petitioners, two Fad Prabharis (field officers) at paddy procurement centers in Mahasamund district, sought permission to withdraw their petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies. The court allowed the withdrawal prayer, which was unopposed by the respondents, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2813/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC No. 2813/2026 on 09/06/2026 after the petitioners, two Fad Prabharis (field officers) at paddy procurement centers in Mahasamund district, sought permission to withdraw their petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies. The court allowed the withdrawal prayer, which was unopposed by the respondents, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts