RAKESH KUMAR NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2820/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 09th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010221332026
Filing Number
WPC/12686/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPC/2820/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESH KUMAR NISHAD
Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.Mohan Singh Jangde
-
3.Uttam Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector
-
3.District Co-Operative Markfed Officer
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
4.Deputy Commissioner
-
5.Branch Manager
Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel
-
6.Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
The writ petition filed by three Fad Prabhari (Food Managers) of Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti against the State of Chhattisgarh and related cooperative authorities was dismissed as withdrawn on 09/06/2026. The petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies, which the court allowed with respondent counsel's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2820/2026
The writ petition filed by three Fad Prabhari (Food Managers) of Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti against the State of Chhattisgarh and related cooperative authorities was dismissed as withdrawn on 09/06/2026. The petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other available legal remedies, which the court allowed with respondent counsel's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts