KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED vs PADMA KRIPLANI — WP227/641/2026

Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Next hearing 27-Jul-2026

CNR: CGHC010220372026

Filing Number

WP227/12647/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP227/641/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

    Adv. Ritesh Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PADMA KRIPLANI

  2. 2.Rajesh Naagwani

  3. 3.Rohit Naagwani

  4. 4.State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents Padma Kriplani, Rajesh Naagwani, and Rohit Naagwani in Kotak Mahindra Bank's writ petition. The court ordered the petitioner to pay prescribed fees within one week and adjourned the matter to the week of July 27, 2026. The applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/641/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents Padma Kriplani, Rajesh Naagwani, and Rohit Naagwani in Kotak Mahindra Bank's writ petition. The court ordered the petitioner to pay prescribed fees within one week and adjourned the matter to the week of July 27, 2026. The applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case