DIVYA RAJA GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4488/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010220082026
Filing Number
WPS/12632/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPS/4488/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIVYA RAJA GUPTA
Adv. SHRIKANT KAUSHIK
-
2.Tookendra Kumar
-
3.Neha Thakur
-
4.Pushpendra Ram
-
5.Ashutosh Thakur
-
6.Madhuri Pathak
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.High Court of Chhattisgarh
Adv. Ashish Tiwari
-
3.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission
Adv. ANAND MOHAN TIWARI
-
4.Ankit Kumar Jha
-
5.Udyan Dubey
-
6.Sanyogita Singh
-
7.Ramakant Patel
-
8.Viraj Kumar Dewangan
-
9.Rahul Verma
-
10.Abhijeet Rath
-
11.Pravin Kumar
-
12.Aashutosh Kumar
-
13.Nidhi Nagwanshi
-
14.Richa Pathak
-
15.Vijay Kumar Sahu
-
16.Manoj Kumar Singh
-
17.Pratibha Lakra
-
18.Bumpy Dubey
-
19.Komal Bhoi
-
20.Shailendra Singh Bhasker
-
21.Kamlesh Kumar Gourkar
-
22.Devendra Bhagat
-
23.Gopal Singh Netam
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 4488/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case and listed it for hearing on 04.08.2026 along with WPS 4341/2026. The court directed respondents to file reply-affidavits in the interim. Applications for urgent hearing (I.A. No.02) and hearing during summer vacation (I.A. No.03) were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4488/2026
Case Summary: WPS 4488/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case and listed it for hearing on 04.08.2026 along with WPS 4341/2026. The court directed respondents to file reply-affidavits in the interim. Applications for urgent hearing (I.A. No.02) and hearing during summer vacation (I.A. No.03) were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts