SUNITA JANGDE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4515/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010220072026

Filing Number

WPS/12631/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPS/4515/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA JANGDE

    Adv. SHRIKANT KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Mission Director

    Adv. C. JAYANT K. RAO

  3. 3.Chief Medical and Health Officer (CMHO)

  4. 4.Joint Director (Finance)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the termination order of Sunita Jangde, a Tuberculosis Health Visitor, finding it violated natural justice principles. The court held that no show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was provided before her termination on 06/05/2026, contrary to Clause 34.2 of the NHM Human Resource Policy-2018 which mandates such procedure for unsatisfactory work performance cases. The court allowed the petition but permitted respondent authorities to proceed afresh with proper due process if they so choose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the termination order of Sunita Jangde, a Tuberculosis Health Visitor, finding it violated natural justice principles. The court held that no show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was provided before her termination on 06/05/2026, contrary to Clause 34.2 of the NHM Human Resource Policy-2018 which mandates such procedure for unsatisfactory work performance cases. The court allowed the petition but permitted respondent authorities to proceed afresh with proper due process if they so choose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case