CHIRAG SAHU (MINOR) vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPC/2829/2026

Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: CGHC010219642026

Filing Number

WPC/12613/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPC/2829/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ACADEMIC MATTERS ( 7 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ADMISSION IN OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 706 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG SAHU (MINOR)

    Adv. NIRAJ BAGHEL,SANCHIT KUMAR SINHA,SANCHIT KUMAR SINHA, ,VIKESHVERI,PREETI PANDEY,SANCHIT KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti,

  3. 3.The Principal,

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPC No. 2829/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard a petition by minor Chirag Sahu against the Union of India and Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti on 09.06.2026. The court directed respondents to file their reply and adjourned the case to 24th June 2026 for fresh consideration. Two applications for urgent hearing (I.A. Nos. 2 and 3) were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2829/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPC No. 2829/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard a petition by minor Chirag Sahu against the Union of India and Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti on 09.06.2026. The court directed respondents to file their reply and adjourned the case to 24th June 2026 for fresh consideration. Two applications for urgent hearing (I.A. Nos. 2 and 3) were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case