MANAGING DIRECTOR CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (CSPDCL) vs SHYAMKALI — FA/122/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010218572026

Filing Number

FA/12546/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

FA/122/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY ETC. ( 1209 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGING DIRECTOR CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (CSPDCL)

    Adv. VARUN SHARMA,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI, ,KRISHNA TANDON,AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI

  2. 2.Executive Engineer (O And M),

  3. 3.Junior Engieer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMKALI

  2. 2.Devraj,

  3. 3.Mannu Kumar @ Dinu Sidar,

  4. 4.Gurwaribai

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh heard an interim application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal by CSPDCL. The court issued notice to respondents on payment of prescribed fees, with the notice returnable within three weeks. The matter was adjourned for further hearing, and the lower court record was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh heard an interim application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal by CSPDCL. The court issued notice to respondents on payment of prescribed fees, with the notice returnable within three weeks. The matter was adjourned for further hearing, and the lower court record was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case