KAILASH KUMAR SAHU vs SMT. DOLLY SAHU — WP227/637/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010218522026

Filing Number

WP227/12545/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP227/637/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILASH KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR SAHU,ANIL KUMAR SAHU,ANIL KUMAR SAHU, ,VIKHYAT ARORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. DOLLY SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP227/637/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the Family Court's order allowing the respondent-wife to amend her written statement in a divorce suit (Civil Suit No. 731/2024). The petitioner argued the amendment should be rejected as trial had commenced, but the High Court held that in matrimonial disputes, a liberal approach to pleadings is warranted to ensure complete adjudication, and no prejudice was caused by permitting the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/637/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP227/637/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the Family Court's order allowing the respondent-wife to amend her written statement in a divorce suit (Civil Suit No. 731/2024). The petitioner argued the amendment should be rejected as trial had commenced, but the High Court held that in matrimonial disputes, a liberal approach to pleadings is warranted to ensure complete adjudication, and no prejudice was caused by permitting the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case