RAJENDRA SHRIVASTAVA vs RAJ KUMARI SHRIVASTAVA — WP227/635/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010217462026

Filing Number

WPC/12505/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP227/635/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA SHRIVASTAVA

    Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL,VIDHI AGRAWAL, ,VIDHI AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMARI SHRIVASTAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP227/635/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's dismissal of petitioner Rajendra Shrivastava's land revenue revision for want of prosecution. Although the court found no merit to grant relief, it directed the petitioner to file a restoration application within 7 days and imposed a stay on coercive action, recognizing that an earlier status quo order had been granted by the Board. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/635/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP227/635/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's dismissal of petitioner Rajendra Shrivastava's land revenue revision for want of prosecution. Although the court found no merit to grant relief, it directed the petitioner to file a restoration application within 7 days and imposed a stay on coercive action, recognizing that an earlier status quo order had been granted by the Board. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case