PURUSHOTTAM BANCHHOR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5042/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010217252026

Filing Number

MCRC/9224/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5042/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURUSHOTTAM BANCHHOR

    Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Purushottam Banchhor's second bail application in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty (Crime No. 54/2026). The court granted regular bail of ₹25,000 with one surety, considering his clean criminal record, completion of investigation, and lengthy trial prospects, while imposing conditions requiring his presence at trial and key court dates. The decision was made without commenting on case merits, balancing the serious allegations against procedural fairness considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5042/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Purushottam Banchhor's second bail application in a case involving allegations of outraging modesty (Crime No. 54/2026). The court granted regular bail of ₹25,000 with one surety, considering his clean criminal record, completion of investigation, and lengthy trial prospects, while imposing conditions requiring his presence at trial and key court dates. The decision was made without commenting on case merits, balancing the serious allegations against procedural fairness considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case