KAMLU TIGGA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5319/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010216992026

Filing Number

MCRC/9207/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5319/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLU TIGGA

    Adv. RAJENDRA PATEL,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU, ,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: MCRC 5319/2026 - Kamlu Tigga v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Kamlu Tigga's bail application in a gang rape case involving repeated sexual assault, wrongful confinement, and intimidation of the prosecutrix across multiple villages. The court found that the prosecutrix's specific allegations and investigative materials prima facie supported the prosecution case, and considering the gravity of offences under BNS Sections 70(2), 64(2)(m), 351(2), 140(3), 127(2), and 3(5), there existed likelihood of witness intimidation if the applicant were released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5319/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MCRC 5319/2026 - Kamlu Tigga v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Kamlu Tigga's bail application in a gang rape case involving repeated sexual assault, wrongful confinement, and intimidation of the prosecutrix across multiple villages. The court found that the prosecutrix's specific allegations and investigative materials prima facie supported the prosecution case, and considering the gravity of offences under BNS Sections 70(2), 64(2)(m), 351(2), 140(3), 127(2), and 3(5), there existed likelihood of witness intimidation if the applicant were released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case