CHANDRAHAS SAHU vs SMT. SEEMA SAHU — WP227/652/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010216602026

Filing Number

WP227/12461/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

WP227/652/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAHAS SAHU

    Adv. B.P.SINGH,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA, ,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh,ADITYA SRIVASTAV,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SEEMA SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP227/652/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Chandrahas Sahu's writ petition seeking expedited proceedings in his pending divorce case (Civil Suit No. 261/2023) filed under Section 13(i)(a)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court directed the Family Court, Durg to conclude the case within four months, noting that plaintiff and defendant had already been examined but the defendant repeatedly failed to produce remaining witnesses despite multiple adjournments since July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/652/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP227/652/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Chandrahas Sahu's writ petition seeking expedited proceedings in his pending divorce case (Civil Suit No. 261/2023) filed under Section 13(i)(a)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court directed the Family Court, Durg to conclude the case within four months, noting that plaintiff and defendant had already been examined but the defendant repeatedly failed to produce remaining witnesses despite multiple adjournments since July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case