RADHESHYAM PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2900/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010216402026
Filing Number
WPC/12447/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2900/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHESHYAM PATEL
Adv. PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas, ,PRANAV KSHATRI,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas
-
2.Radhe Lal Patel
-
3.San Kumar Patel
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Tahsildar
-
4.The Patwari
-
5.The Sarpanch
-
6.Smt. Shahar Bai
-
7.Preeti Patel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2900/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the Collector of Balodabazar-Bhatapara to expeditiously consider the petitioners' complaint dated 22.05.2026 and ensure their objections and mutation application under Sections 109-110 of the Land Revenue Code are properly entertained by the Tahsildar. The court mandated that all affected parties, including the petitioners claiming legal heir status to deceased property owners, receive due hearing before any order affecting property rights is passed, while leaving all substantive merits for the revenue authority to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2900/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2900/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the Collector of Balodabazar-Bhatapara to expeditiously consider the petitioners' complaint dated 22.05.2026 and ensure their objections and mutation application under Sections 109-110 of the Land Revenue Code are properly entertained by the Tahsildar. The court mandated that all affected parties, including the petitioners claiming legal heir status to deceased property owners, receive due hearing before any order affecting property rights is passed, while leaving all substantive merits for the revenue authority to decide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts