RAMKUMAR ARVIND ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,ANURAG BAJPAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5056/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010215252026

Filing Number

MCRC/9146/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5056/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMKUMAR ARVIND ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,ANURAG BAJPAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5056/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Ramkumar Arvind, arrested for wildlife protection violations, finding him implicated solely on a co-accused's statement with no physical evidence seized from his possession and no criminal record. The court imposed strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5056/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5056/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Ramkumar Arvind, arrested for wildlife protection violations, finding him implicated solely on a co-accused's statement with no physical evidence seized from his possession and no criminal record. The court imposed strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case