HARIBANSH KUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2757/2026
Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010215162026
Filing Number
WPC/12376/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2757/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIBANSH KUMAR PANDEY
Adv. DHIRAJ KUMAR WANKHEDE,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN, ,ANIRUDDH SINGH,SHAHIL SINGH,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN
-
2.Seema Devi Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Tahsildar Raipur
-
3.Naib Tahsildar Raipur,
-
4.Station House Officer
-
5.Shri Praveen Parmar,
-
6.Punjab National Bank,
Adv. Sharad Mishra
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
Case Summary: WPC No. 2757 of 2026 On 02/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard the petition filed by Haribansh Kumar Pandey and Seema Devi Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh. The petitioners' counsel stated their willingness to deposit the entire outstanding amount. Respondent No. 6's counsel directed the petitioners to approach the concerned Bank Authority for deposit. The case was adjourned to 04/06/2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2757/2026
Case Summary: WPC No. 2757 of 2026 On 02/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard the petition filed by Haribansh Kumar Pandey and Seema Devi Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh. The petitioners' counsel stated their willingness to deposit the entire outstanding amount. Respondent No. 6's counsel directed the petitioners to approach the concerned Bank Authority for deposit. The case was adjourned to 04/06/2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts