SUMANT MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,HIMANSHU PANDEY — WPC/2320/2020
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010214802020
Filing Number
WPC/10680/2020
Filing Date
17-Sep-2020
Registration No
WPC/2320/2020
Registration Date
03-Oct-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMANT MISHRA
Adv. VIVEK VERMA,ROHISHEK VERMA (NOC),ROHISHEK VERMA (NOC), ,UDIT KHATRI,ROHISHEK VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,HIMANSHU PANDEY
-
2.National Highway Authority of India
Adv. HIMANSHU PANDEY,MOHIT KAUSHAL NAVYA GOPAN B.GOPA KUMAR
-
3.Collector
-
4.Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) and Land Acquisition Officer
-
5.Tahsildar
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
On 06/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case as the petitioner was absent. The case was listed for hearing after the summer vacation, with only the State's counsel present. No substantive order on the petition's merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
28-Jul-2025
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For The Nation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
08-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
17-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
06-Nov-2020
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
09-Oct-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
09-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2320/2020
On 06/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case as the petitioner was absent. The case was listed for hearing after the summer vacation, with only the State's counsel present. No substantive order on the petition's merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts