RAJKUMAR RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPCR/299/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010214602026
Filing Number
WPCR/12348/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPCR/299/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJKUMAR RATRE
Adv. PRABHU LAL,JEET RAM PATEL,JEET RAM PATEL, ,JEET RAM PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director General of Police
-
3.The Inspector General Of Police
-
4.The Superintendent of Police
-
5.Sub Divisional Officer (Police)
-
6.Station House Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Rajkumar Ratre's writ petition challenging the police's refusal to register an FIR for motorcycle theft despite his complaint dated 27.02.2026. Although the court acknowledged the mandatory nature of FIR registration for cognizable offences under the Lalita Kumari precedent, it held that the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy available under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCR/299/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Rajkumar Ratre's writ petition challenging the police's refusal to register an FIR for motorcycle theft despite his complaint dated 27.02.2026. Although the court acknowledged the mandatory nature of FIR registration for cognizable offences under the Lalita Kumari precedent, it held that the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy available under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts