SHOBHA RANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2796/2026
Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 09th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010214562026
Filing Number
WPC/12345/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2796/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ELECTION MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ELECTIONS RELATING TO MUNICIPAL COUNCILS/CORPORATION. ( 911 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--INFRUCTUOUS
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHOBHA RANI
Adv. ANSHUL TIWARI,Nupur Trivedi,Nupur Trivedi, ,AMISHAN HUSSAIN,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,Nupur Trivedi
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Chhattisgarh State Election Commission
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR JHA
-
3.District Election Officer
-
4.Chief Municipal Officer
-
5.Returning Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/2796/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Shobha Rani against the State of Chhattisgarh and election officials pertaining to municipal council ward elections in Dipka. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time, rendering it incapable of providing any relief. Accordingly, the petition and related interim applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2796/2026
Case Summary: WPC/2796/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Shobha Rani against the State of Chhattisgarh and election officials pertaining to municipal council ward elections in Dipka. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time, rendering it incapable of providing any relief. Accordingly, the petition and related interim applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts