ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, BHANDARSIVANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPC/2774/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010213942026
Filing Number
WPC/12316/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2774/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT ( 1754 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, BHANDARSIVANI
Adv. shobhit koshta,RAJENDRA KUMAR,RAJENDRA KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
-
2.Registrar Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Society,
-
3.Managing Director,
Adv. Siddharth Pandey
-
4.District Marketing Officer Kondagaon,
-
5.Assistant Commissioner / Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Society,
-
6.Nodal Officer District Co-Operative Bank Limited,
-
7.Managing Director,
Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary: WPC No. 2774/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of multiple consolidated petitions filed by cooperative societies challenging government orders directing them to supply paddy shortages shown on the procurement portal. The court directed authorities to decide the disputes on merits within 30 days after affording petitioners due hearing, while prohibiting coercive action pending resolution, without making any observations on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2774/2026
Summary: WPC No. 2774/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of multiple consolidated petitions filed by cooperative societies challenging government orders directing them to supply paddy shortages shown on the procurement portal. The court directed authorities to decide the disputes on merits within 30 days after affording petitioners due hearing, while prohibiting coercive action pending resolution, without making any observations on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts