RAVISHANKAR BAGHEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPHC/16/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010213882026
Filing Number
WPHC/12311/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WPHC/16/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS ( 13 )
Sub-Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS. ( 1301 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVISHANKAR BAGHEL
Adv. PRASHANT SAHU,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA, ,PRIYA KAIWART,PRIYA KAIWART,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Superintendent of Police
-
4.The Station House Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Ravishankar Baghel seeking release of his brother Ganpat Baghel from police detention. The court found that Ganpat's detention was lawful, as an FIR (Crime No. 61 of 2026) had been registered against him for offences under BNS sections 331(8), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2), 238 and Arms Act sections 25-27, and he was held in judicial custody pursuant to a Judicial Magistrate's order. The court ruled that habeas corpus is maintainable only for illegal detention, and since the detention was authorized by law, the petition lacked merit and was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPHC/16/2026
CASE SUMMARY: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Ravishankar Baghel seeking release of his brother Ganpat Baghel from police detention. The court found that Ganpat's detention was lawful, as an FIR (Crime No. 61 of 2026) had been registered against him for offences under BNS sections 331(8), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2), 238 and Arms Act sections 25-27, and he was held in judicial custody pursuant to a Judicial Magistrate's order. The court ruled that habeas corpus is maintainable only for illegal detention, and since the detention was authorized by law, the petition lacked merit and was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts