VINITA MANIKPURI vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPS/4478/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010213692026

Filing Number

WPS/12303/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4478/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINITA MANIKPURI

    Adv. AWADH TRIPATHI,INDIRA TRIPATHI,INDIRA TRIPATHI, ,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,MANISH KUMAR SAHU,SHIKHAR AGNIHOTRI,Shubham Tripathi,Shubham Tripathi,Vivek kumar tripathi,INDIRA TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.Assistant Director General (SPN) Post Services,

  3. 3.Assistant Director Staff Chhattisgarh Circle Raipur,

  4. 4.Superintendent RMS RP Dn.

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 4478/2026 - Vinita Manikpuri v. Union of India Vinita Manikpuri, a Deputy Manager at National Sorting Hub Raipur, challenged her transfer order (dated 23.04.2026) from Chhattisgarh Circle to Maharashtra Circle, claiming the order lacked specificity and reasons. She filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Jabalpur but sought interim protection because CAT Jabalpur was closed for summer vacation (18.05.2026-12.06.2026), forcing her to approach CAT Allahabad or Hyderabad instead—which she argued was impractical as a woman employee. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief, staying the transfer order's effect until 16.06.2026 to allow her case hearing before CAT Jabalpur, noting the specific circumstance of tribunal closure. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on merits and the stay was purely procedural. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4478/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 4478/2026 - Vinita Manikpuri v. Union of India Vinita Manikpuri, a Deputy Manager at National Sorting Hub Raipur, challenged her transfer order (dated 23.04.2026) from Chhattisgarh Circle to Maharashtra Circle, claiming the order lacked specificity and reasons. She filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Jabalpur but sought interim protection because CAT Jabalpur was closed for summer vacation (18.05.2026-12.06.2026), forcing her to approach CAT Allahabad or Hyderabad instead—which she argued was impractical as a woman employee. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief, staying the transfer order's effect until 16.06.2026 to allow her case hearing before CAT Jabalpur, noting the specific circumstance of tribunal closure. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on merits and the stay was purely procedural. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case