GEETANJALI MAHILA SWA SAHAYATA SAMOOH, TULSAGHAT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPC/2738/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010213422026

Filing Number

WPC/12285/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2738/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO FAIR PRICE SHOP ( 1759 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETANJALI MAHILA SWA SAHAYATA SAMOOH, TULSAGHAT

    Adv. A.S.RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  2. 2.The Director of Food,

  3. 3.The Collector (Food)

  4. 4.Food Controller,

  5. 5.The Sub Divisional Officer (R), Lormi,

  6. 6.Mahalaxmi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to Geetanjali Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh by staying the fair price shop suspension order dated 04.02.2026 until the next hearing. The petitioner challenged the arbitrary suspension allegedly passed without considering her reply to show-cause notice, while the State claimed deficiencies in rice, sugar, and salt were found during inspection. The court granted the State 4 weeks to file a detailed reply and listed the case for further hearing upon service of notice to the remaining respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2738/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief to Geetanjali Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh by staying the fair price shop suspension order dated 04.02.2026 until the next hearing. The petitioner challenged the arbitrary suspension allegedly passed without considering her reply to show-cause notice, while the State claimed deficiencies in rice, sugar, and salt were found during inspection. The court granted the State 4 weeks to file a detailed reply and listed the case for further hearing upon service of notice to the remaining respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case