SMT. CHANDRAPRABHA SURYAVANSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5317/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010213112026

Filing Number

MCRC/9043/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5317/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. CHANDRAPRABHA SURYAVANSHI

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GULATI,GUNJA TARAM,GUNJA TARAM, ,SYED MOHSIN HAIDER JAFRI,SYED MOHSIN HAIDER JAFRI,GUNJA TARAM

  2. 2.Abha Suyavanshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Smt. Chandraprabha Suryavanshi and Abha Suyavanshi, arrested for dowry-related abetment of suicide under BNS Sections 80(2) & 3(5). The court found no direct/circumstantial evidence establishing their involvement, no suicide note was recovered, and no prior complaints of harassment existed. They were released on personal bond with two local sureties each, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Smt. Chandraprabha Suryavanshi and Abha Suyavanshi, arrested for dowry-related abetment of suicide under BNS Sections 80(2) & 3(5). The court found no direct/circumstantial evidence establishing their involvement, no suicide note was recovered, and no prior complaints of harassment existed. They were released on personal bond with two local sureties each, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case