PARMESHWAR KANWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1537/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010213042026

Filing Number

CRMP/9039/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1537/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMESHWAR KANWAR

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI, ,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI,MAYA CHATURVIJANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    CRMP/1537/2026 Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petitioner Parmeshwar Kanwar's petition to correct a typographical error in a previous judgment (CRA No. 430 of 2025 dated 17.03.2026). The petitioner's name was incorrectly mentioned as "Rameshwar Kanwar" instead of "Parmeshwar Kanwar" in paragraph 56. The State raised no objection, and the court directed the correction be made in the original judgment record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRMP/1537/2026 Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petitioner Parmeshwar Kanwar's petition to correct a typographical error in a previous judgment (CRA No. 430 of 2025 dated 17.03.2026). The petitioner's name was incorrectly mentioned as "Rameshwar Kanwar" instead of "Parmeshwar Kanwar" in paragraph 56. The State raised no objection, and the court directed the correction be made in the original judgment record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case