HEMANT NAG vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/898/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010212642026

Filing Number

MCRCA/9016/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/898/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT NAG

    Adv. PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI, ,Abhishek Nirala,VIKAS PATEL,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hemant Nag in a case involving allegations of maintaining a physical relationship under the pretext of marriage (Sections 64(2)(m) and 89, BNS 2023). The court found that the relationship was consensual and the FIR was lodged only after the relationship failed to materialize, including a pregnancy that was aborted. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond, surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/898/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Hemant Nag in a case involving allegations of maintaining a physical relationship under the pretext of marriage (Sections 64(2)(m) and 89, BNS 2023). The court found that the relationship was consensual and the FIR was lodged only after the relationship failed to materialize, including a pregnancy that was aborted. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond, surety, non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case