ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, BORGAON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2793/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010212622026

Filing Number

WPC/12248/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2793/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT ( 1754 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, BORGAON

    Adv. shobhit koshta,RAJENDRA KUMAR,RAJENDRA KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Registrar Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Society,

  3. 3.Managing Director,

    Adv. Siddharth Pandey

  4. 4.District Marketing Officer Kondagaon,

  5. 5.Assistant Commissioner / Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Society,

  6. 6.Nodal Officer District Co-Operative Bank Limited,

  7. 7.Managing Director,

    Adv. Shaleen Singh Baghel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC No. 2793/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the respondent authorities to decide the paddy procurement dispute within 30 days after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while prohibiting any coercive action against the petitioner society until a decision is reached. Key Issue: Multiple agricultural cooperative societies challenged notices requiring them to deliver shortages of paddy quantities (ranging from 278-2,892 quintals per society) displayed on the procurement portal, claiming no dryage was permitted under 2025-26 policy. The petitioners had already filed replies to the notice but authorities had not decided the dispute. Reasoning: The court found the respondent authorities obligated to decide the dispute according to law on its merits, and deemed it appropriate to prevent coercive measures pending this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2793/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC No. 2793/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the respondent authorities to decide the paddy procurement dispute within 30 days after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while prohibiting any coercive action against the petitioner society until a decision is reached. Key Issue: Multiple agricultural cooperative societies challenged notices requiring them to deliver shortages of paddy quantities (ranging from 278-2,892 quintals per society) displayed on the procurement portal, claiming no dryage was permitted under 2025-26 policy. The petitioners had already filed replies to the notice but authorities had not decided the dispute. Reasoning: The court found the respondent authorities obligated to decide the dispute according to law on its merits, and deemed it appropriate to prevent coercive measures pending this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case