SHAMIM REHMAN OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR,PRASHANT SAHU,PRIYA KAIWART,Sharad Mishra,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,SHRIKANT MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1482/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010212222026

Filing Number

CRMP/8998/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1482/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMIM REHMAN OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR,PRASHANT SAHU,PRIYA KAIWART,Sharad Mishra,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,SHRIKANT MISHRA

  2. 2.Bharat Sukhwani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted the trial court's request for a further four-month extension to conclude the trial, finding the request reasonable given substantial evidence remains to be recorded. Of 42 prosecution witnesses cited, only 6 have testified and 2 have been abandoned, with the case continuously fixed for evidence recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1482/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted the trial court's request for a further four-month extension to conclude the trial, finding the request reasonable given substantial evidence remains to be recorded. Of 42 prosecution witnesses cited, only 6 have testified and 2 have been abandoned, with the case continuously fixed for evidence recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case