FULESHWARI BANJARE YOGESH KUMAR CHANDRA, ,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJENDRA PATEL,SAHIL SAHU — WPC/2687/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010211842026

Filing Number

WPC/12208/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2687/2026

Registration Date

23-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ELECTION MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ELECTIONS OF GRAM PANCHAYATS ( 901 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FULESHWARI BANJARE YOGESH KUMAR CHANDRA, ,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJENDRA PATEL,SAHIL SAHU

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer (R)

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

  5. 5.Tahsildar

  6. 6.Varsha Tondan

  7. 7.Lilavati Sahu

  8. 8.Mankumari Sahu

  9. 9.Balmukund Sahu

  10. 10.Utter Kumar Tondan

  11. 11.Neera Paikara

  12. 12.Vinod Kumar Sahu

  13. 13.Shivkumari Prajapati

  14. 14.David Kumar Prajapati

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2687/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court held that the Sarpanch (petitioner) did not receive proper 7-day notice as mandated by the Panchayat Raj Act before the no-confidence motion hearing. The notice was issued on 20.05.2026 but received only on 24.05.2026, with the motion scheduled for 29.05.2026—insufficient time. The court rejected the State's argument that notice periods count from dispatch date, ruling the 7-day period must be counted from when the Janpad Panchayat (ultimate dispatcher) sends notice to the Sarpanch. Accordingly, the court postponed the no-confidence motion to on or after 31.05.2026, directing the petitioner to cooperate and provide records for examination in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2687/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2687/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court held that the Sarpanch (petitioner) did not receive proper 7-day notice as mandated by the Panchayat Raj Act before the no-confidence motion hearing. The notice was issued on 20.05.2026 but received only on 24.05.2026, with the motion scheduled for 29.05.2026—insufficient time. The court rejected the State's argument that notice periods count from dispatch date, ruling the 7-day period must be counted from when the Janpad Panchayat (ultimate dispatcher) sends notice to the Sarpanch. Accordingly, the court postponed the no-confidence motion to on or after 31.05.2026, directing the petitioner to cooperate and provide records for examination in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case